What does DfMA stand for? A simple definition framework for DfMA and MMC
Appropriate levels of autonomy, while recognising the need to maintain prisoner and staff safety.
“Shared value is fundamentally about aligning the success of your company with the success of your community — through the recognition that you have a responsibility — and an economic opportunity — to improve the business environment and the fundamental health of the supporting community structure.”.As value is realised conceptually, cornerstones of the design, delivery approach and culture need to be established.
These ecosystem-conditions, design-features, delivery and operational principles; along with construction approaches, e.g.DfMA, will represent the decisions required to hold onto and deliver the value.. Somebody.needs to watch these carefully.. That does not mean that they will not or cannot be changed, it does mean that any shifting of the cornerstones is picked up quickly and holistic problem solving is kicked-off to retain or increase the value.
Project management is often focused on physical scope change and can be blind to shifts in approach and people dynamics which can have profound impacts..If market demand starts to increase, is there an opportunity to take advantage or vice versa.
If a construction partner finds a cheaper way to deliver a part of the project does that put holistic value at risk or maybe it allows investment elsewhere where more value can be delivered.. As design moves towards construction and beyond, an.
approach needs to ensure that all parties are doing the job that fits their capability best and decisions are made with a focus on delivering shared value, to client, the client’s customers, the widest project team and society.. Of course, the way the work is contracted needs to be aligned to sharing value, of which financial risks and opportunities play a significant role; but that is another story….This project was the city’s response to the allocation of 20,000 migrants fleeing Syria, Afghanistan, and Iraq to be housed.
This was a people problem with complex, strong and diverse views and issues to negotiate.Although they used some very advanced modelling techniques, this was done only to support and inform a big conversation.
They largely got rid of the traditional processes of city planning, keeping only those things that seemed immovable.Instead they used a process of discussion.